TPO 15
The lecturer completely refutes the reading passage. The speaker uses three points to indicate that none of the solutions which are given in the article is effective to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia.
First, although a fence was successful to stop rabbits from spreading back in the begining of the twentieth century, a fence would not stop cane toads from spreading. This is because young toad and eggs are usually found in rivers and streams and they could cross the fence to new areas and establish new habbitates. This facts shows that building a national fence would be unlikely to stop cane toads from spreading.
Second, even thogh cane toads can be easily captured and destroyed by volunteers, other species might be destroyed as well. The professors mentions that there are many endangered frog species which live alongside with cane toads and they look similar to each other. Thus, untrained volunteers might hunt and destroy other young frogs instead of cane toads. This would cause other unwanted problem to the environment.
Finally, it is true that researchers have developed a virus that targets cane toads reproductive system, but it will infect other reptiles that usually get transfered to Central and South America. These repltiles will transmit the virus to the cane toads in both Americas where native cane toads live. This soultion is not parctical because it will destroy one of the most important species in the Americas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...new areas and establish new habbitates. This facts shows that building a national fe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
...nd establish new habbitates. This facts shows that building a national fence would be...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'mention'.
Suggestion: mention
...ht be destroyed as well. The professors mentions that there are many endangered frog spe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, look, second, so, thus, well, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10330578512 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45521667646 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574380165289 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.901587745 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.916666667 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.548452641465 0.272083759551 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194562997019 0.0996497079465 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11980932272 0.0662205650399 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304864722332 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086622595534 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.