According to passage, cane toads introduce in the Australia from the south and Central America for benefit purpose but the cane toad now harmful for native species of the Australia, increase the population of toads and spread causes few specific tactic to hinder the population growth and spread. However, according to the lecture, author's provide the method for rid the cane toad in the Australia are unsuccessful because of three reason as discusses following paragraphs.
Firstly, the reading states that build a nation fence cause prevent to enter not colonized area. In contrast, the lecturer mentions that young toad and egg travel by the river and stream to one side to other side of the areas, therefore, establish the fence doesn't work to rid the toad’s populations.
Secondly, the passage implies that volunteer catch and prevent the toad spreading. On the other hand, the speaker explains that untrained volunteer can't distinguish between native frog and young cane toads, as result of the damage to native frog and other species.
Lastly, the author's emphasizes that developing virus to deter the toad’s populations. In contrary, the professor points out that virus infect to toads and which is transport in to the South America, consequently, infected toads spread infection to the other toads of the South America. In fact, the cane toads is play essential role in ecosystem as well as toads are one of the native spice of South America. As result, the serious effect on the South America’s ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e areas, therefore, establish the fence doesnt work to rid the toad's populations...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...eaker explains that untrained volunteer cant distinguish between native frog and you...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, in contrast, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 22.412803532 27% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1935483871 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6772250221 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7994186022 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.8 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.3 7.06452816374 217% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44812509678 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172049483687 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106894080359 0.0662205650399 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252398571687 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897071658887 0.0443174109184 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.