The reading and lecture both discuss archaeological constructions. While the reading states that in the United Kingdom we have lots of historical residential place and these place back to long time ago and the science was not able to cover all of these old cultures. The lecture refutes this, saying that in 1990 we had ruled in the United Kingdom and its cause changes the culture and led to create the new situation.
First of all, the reading clams that since 1950s many constructions become the ruin. According to the reading, by growing new construction in towns and cities, the artefacts did not protect and become the ruin. However, the lecture argues that the government preserve all of the archaeological construction and by the new guideline constructed the archaeological makes more interesting and valuable.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that the financial support of did not enough. Moreover, the government has been secured the archaeologists and sometimes changing the government cause reducing the financials. The lecture counters this point by stating that the financial of the archaeological construction, secured by the archaeological construction, not by government financial.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that the archaeology did not have lots of job and occupation. Many people want to get the job but this position only found in universities and government institutes. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that all archaeological provide many position and career. According to the lecture ,many career such as science professional, researcher, processed data, writing article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ure argues that the government preserve all of the archaeological construction and by the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of jobs'.
Suggestion: lots of jobs
...rgues that the archaeology did not have lots of job and occupation. Many people want to get...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun position seems to be countable; consider using: 'many positions'.
Suggestion: many positions
...ing out that all archaeological provide many position and career. According to the lecture ,m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion and career. According to the lecture ,many career such as science professional...
^^
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun career seems to be countable; consider using: 'many careers'.
Suggestion: many careers
...n and career. According to the lecture ,many career such as science professional, researche...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'lastly', 'moreover', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'such as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253571428571 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.146428571429 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0892857142857 0.0723426182421 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0535714285714 0.0435111971325 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0107142857143 0.0277247811725 39% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107142857143 0.128828473217 83% => OK
Participles: 0.05 0.0370669169778 135% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.14240435329 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0214285714286 0.0208969081088 103% => OK
Particles: 0.00357142857143 0.00154638098197 231% => OK
Determiners: 0.157142857143 0.128158765124 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00357142857143 0.0114777025283 31% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1633.0 1645.83664459 99% => OK
No of words: 253.0 271.125827815 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.45454545455 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.387351778656 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.343873517787 0.287516216867 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213438735178 0.187439937562 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.169960474308 0.113142543107 150% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14240435329 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501976284585 0.539623497131 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.1384238471 53.8517498576 88% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.4615384615 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7136198002 49.3711431718 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.615384615 132.220823453 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.769230769231 0.878197800319 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 53.8488902402 50.5018328374 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.94915254237 1.90840788429 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.623778007635 0.549887131256 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.178063751887 0.142949733639 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0640244511291 0.0787303798458 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.66653295019 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126438868356 0.139662658121 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.333695556471 0.266732575781 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898558374508 0.103435571967 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.550547774993 0.414875509568 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.101105798438 0.0530846634433 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.493940005088 0.40443939384 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407336938151 0.0528353158467 77% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.