The reading and the listening are both about archaeology in United Kingdom and whether the subject is prioritized over other superficial studies. The author is of the opinion that the science of archaeology has faced serious problems and limitations in the country. However, the professor casts doubts on each of the claims presented by the author. She states that the author's proposition is based on several unconscionable assumptions, and asserting that archaeological study in Britain is not endorsed is purely injudicious.
To begin with, the author claims that construction sites do not preserve the artifacts, if they encounter any, while digging foundations for new buildings. The point is challenged by the professor. She states that before initiating any construction, the site is examined by the researchers and scientists. She points out that if the site is declared of some archaeological interest and value, it is isolated and researchers work in unison for preserving the artifacts, excavating, documenting it.
In addition, the author argues that no financial support is dedicated for archaeological research. However, the professor rebuts this argument. She affirms that today’s archaeological research are funded by construction companies itself, and not government. She adds to her explanation that some scientists with profound knowledge about the subject are even sponsored to continue their research.
Finally, the author mentions that it is difficult these days to have a career in archaeology due to lack of positions available in few universities and government agencies. The professor, on the other hand, notes that expert archaeologists are hired all around the world to examine the sites for the archaeological importance. These experts work on presentation plans, do research on the subject, study processes and even write reports on the same.
In conclusion, the professor effectively refutes each of the claims and theories presented in the passage.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.258823529412 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.173529411765 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0558823529412 0.0723426182421 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0294117647059 0.0435111971325 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0352941176471 0.0277247811725 127% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147058823529 0.128828473217 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0588235294118 0.0370669169778 159% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.24314210343 2.5805825403 126% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0176470588235 0.0208969081088 84% => OK
Particles: 0.00294117647059 0.00154638098197 190% => OK
Determiners: 0.138235294118 0.128158765124 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0114777025283 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1994.0 1645.83664459 121% => OK
No of words: 302.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.60264900662 6.08160592843 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.423841059603 0.374372842146 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.347682119205 0.287516216867 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.281456953642 0.187439937562 150% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.215231788079 0.113142543107 190% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.24314210343 2.5805825403 126% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55298013245 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 57.8507010426 53.8517498576 107% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.875 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9873027682 49.3711431718 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.625 132.220823453 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.878197800319 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 53.6432119205 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.95061728395 1.90840788429 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.577264198773 0.549887131256 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123611053069 0.142949733639 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0768133960568 0.0787303798458 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.614072973159 0.631733273073 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150692235638 0.139662658121 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.272551205712 0.266732575781 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109401381059 0.103435571967 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.408558242793 0.414875509568 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0837749534334 0.0530846634433 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.414425818654 0.40443939384 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758054950793 0.0528353158467 143% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.