In the lecture the speaker explains why no one of the problem presented in the reading serve as explanation of the purpose why if the human population increase that will result in decline in the number of the birds in USA. The three reasons why the professor refutes the points made in the reading will be explained below.
First of all, the lecture asserts that it is true that will result in reduce and decline of the birds population, but not for all kind of birds. On the other hand, some popilotion will increase in the city, while others will decrease. This point directly refutes the point from the reading, which claims that as human populations continue to expand, all natural habitats will continue to disappear.
Second, the lecture avers that it is true that will led to increase in agricultural activities, but not in the same way the reading discusess that. She sates that the truth is now usa use less and less land and the production resulted from the introduction new more productive crops. Which means there are more foods , so no need to destroy any land. Again, this disputes what is stated in reading, which is the growth of agriculture will result in the future destruction of bird habitats.
Third, the professor argues that today people are aware more about the side effects of pesticides on birds. As result two changes have done, the first change is that people now use natural pesticides which are less toxic. The second change is growing persistent crops, which means that these crops are in their genetic persistent to insects. This point disputes the point from the passage as well, because the reading argues that more agricultural activities, more chemical pesticides will use to kill insects.
There is a wrong topic and we
There is a wrong topic and we have fixed it out. You can find all correct topics from:
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...ill result in reduce and decline of the birds population, but not for all kind of bir...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... On the other hand, some popilotion will increase in the city, while others will...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e popilotion will increase in the city, while others will decrease. This point d...
^^
Line 6, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... productive crops. Which means there are more foods , so no need to destroy any ...
^^
Line 6, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crops. Which means there are more foods , so no need to destroy any land. Again,...
^^
Line 6, column 319, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rops. Which means there are more foods , so no need to destroy any land. Again, ...
^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... two changes have done, the first change is that people now use natural pesticide...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, third, well, while, kind of, first of all, it is true, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89152542373 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45190916729 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498305084746 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9827117322 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396620429108 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133013899803 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756603154401 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230662165221 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476791156446 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.