The reading states that increased human activity of using pesticides, expanded agricultural places and enlarged urban places decrease bird population. However, the professor provides examples that cast doubt on the points made in the passage.
The reading states, forests, wetlands, and grasslands replace with malls, offices and more homes. So, bird population are decreased by these changes. The professor tells us that urban city provide large bird habitat instead of degraded birth population and city complain about increased bird habitat like seagull, pigeon on streets. So, some bird population shrink, other’s increased.
The author says that agricultural areas are increased and bird habitat are negatively affected by loss of wilder area. The argument which tells us declined bird population by increased agricultural area is true but it is not soon. Truth is less land use in agriculture every year. Crops become more productive and people do not need to destroy more wild areas.
The reading assert that, human utilize pesticides to protect crops and these chemicals dissolve with water and consume by birds somehow. That cause to death of birds or damage reproduction of birds healthily. Professor describes that People are aware of consequences of pesticides on birds and other animals. They changed 2 things for nature. First of all, they degraded toxic level of pesticides and birds are not adversely affected as past. Second, crops have more resistance to pesticides and that reduces chemical effect of pesticides. So, pesticides do not harm birds at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...o destroy more wild areas. The reading assert that, human utilize pesticides to prote...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., pesticides do not harm birds at all.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4593495935 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68325016529 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593495934959 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2547354603 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4705882353 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64705882353 7.06452816374 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445825062787 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144169621851 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683434443372 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256154423006 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590165765908 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.