The reading passage contends that there are three ways to prevent Torreya taxifoha, which is a type of evergreen tree once vey common in the state of Florida, from declining. On the other hand, the lecturer brings about several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the lecturer questions the validity of the reading passage’s point that it is better for Torreya to reestablish itself in the same location in which once they thrived for thousands of years. This is attributed to the fact that even if Torreya is shifted into the northern part of Florida, there are several concerns. As global warming is occurred, many areas across the United States also have been becoming dry, increasing temperature. Consequently, the reading passage’s first point is invalid.
Moreover, the lecturer cast doubt on the point in the reading passage that moving Torreya to different areas further north, where the temperature is significantly cooler, is the second option. This is because in the past, scientists have moved Black Rocus trees to different locations; however, the trees have thrived and attacked other trees in the same ecosystem. And many of tree species were extinct by them. It might be unpredictable and need to research carefully more and more. Thus, the reading passage’s second point is contradicted.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the point in the reading passage that preserving Torreya in research center is the third option. It is obvious that they are not capable to resist to divers disease for a long period. This is due to the fact that for resisting to diverse disease, they are needed to large genetic diverse. However, in the research center, there are limited to not be provided large genetic diverse. As a result, the reading passage’s final point is confused.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage contends that there ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... points that contradict this argument. First of all, the lecturer questions the...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...passage's first point is invalid. Moreover, the lecturer cast doubt on the...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e's second point is contradicted. Last but not least, the lecturer disagre...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thus', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233618233618 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.156695156695 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.108262108262 0.0723426182421 150% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0598290598291 0.0435111971325 138% => OK
Pronouns: 0.022792022792 0.0277247811725 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108262108262 0.128828473217 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0541310541311 0.0370669169778 146% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7442037132 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.034188034188 0.0208969081088 164% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0997150997151 0.128158765124 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00569800569801 0.0158828679856 36% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.011396011396 0.0114777025283 99% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1842.0 1645.83664459 112% => OK
No of words: 299.0 271.125827815 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.16053511706 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377926421405 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.314381270903 0.287516216867 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183946488294 0.187439937562 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110367892977 0.113142543107 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7442037132 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511705685619 0.539623497131 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.2971195326 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.6875 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5515829717 49.3711431718 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 132.220823453 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.878197800319 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 50.1256270903 50.5018328374 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.65476190476 1.90840788429 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.6815601784 0.549887131256 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134342479186 0.142949733639 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.110884496434 0.0787303798458 141% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.539900399944 0.631733273073 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163597625191 0.139662658121 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.282323702702 0.266732575781 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146578542028 0.103435571967 142% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.481776982234 0.414875509568 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0290524248958 0.0530846634433 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.526879657674 0.40443939384 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518797247493 0.0528353158467 98% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.