The reading states that there are three ways to save Torreya and provides these three ways. The professor, however, explains that the author' options does not provides satisfactory solutions and refutes each of author's ways.
First, the reading claims that the first way is to reestablish Torreya in the same location in which it thrivd for thousands of years. The professor states that reestablishing them to the northern part of Florida would be unlikely successful. He explains that Torreya needs a cold area and that area has high tempreture. He also mentions that it is dryer than its area.
Second, the reading states that they can move Torreya to an entirely different location.The professor contends this point by saying that human move other trees to different area but they dont enduring new conditions.
Third, the reading states that preserve Torreya in research centers would be another option. The professor refutes this point by saying that there are some problems with this option. He says that not only the population must resist diversity but also there are not enough capacity. The professor, also, mentions that they must capable of surviving long-term disease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading states that there are three ways to save Torreya and provides ...
^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provide'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: provide
...plains that the author options does not provides satisfactory solutions and refutes each...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...plains that the author options does not provides satisfactory solutions and refutes each...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...rreya to an entirely different location.The professor contends this point by saying...
^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... other trees to different area but they dont enduring new conditions. Third, the re...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 191.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20942408377 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51762243806 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575916230366 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.498780227 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4545454545 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307850989621 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117636865525 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887307849418 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183342643424 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758415885369 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.