The reading and the lecture are both about Torreya taxifoha, which is once very popular around Florida but gradually have been declining. The author of reading gives three possible solution against this problem. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in the article. The thinks that all posible solutions are illogical and do not reflect the fact that.
First of all, the author of reading points out that Torreya taxifoha should be reestablished in the same location that they once live because it is micro climate area. This point is challanged by the lecturer. She says that this location getting cooler and cooler therefore it hurts their life. Furthermore, she argues that because of global tempreture increasing region is too dry for Torreya taxifona.
Secondly, author contends that they might be moved to different location where tempreture is cooler. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She notes that this argument is experienced before with Black Locas three and failed because when they moved there, they killed other plant and disturbed the balance of forest. She eleborates this by mentioning that scientiest should avoid of to do because its unpredictible consequences might be irrepressible.
Finally, the author of reading states that researchers may investigate them in research center therefore they can monitor result with the computer and devices. The lecturer, on the other hand, posist that centers are not capable of this kind of research because it needs too large area. She puts forth the idea that this research can cause disase and scientiest can not resist.
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all of the claims and theories presented in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...possible solution against this problem. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made ...
^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...doubt on the claim made in the article. The thinks that all posible solutions are i...
^^^
Line 9, column 56, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all of the claims and theories presented in the re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25912408759 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58148931016 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565693430657 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5424763796 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0625 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215458195929 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654920076595 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626764888396 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104692431595 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651051885547 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.