The lecture and the reading both discuss buzzing. While the reading states that many companies use a method to market products which called buzzing. According to the reading, bussers do not show they paid for marketing and the buzzing always create a serious argument between people. The lecture refutes this, saying that buzzers are really misleading and gives a wrong expression.
First of all, the reading claims that people should pay attention to paid money to the product that is praising a product by someone because of people do not eager misleading information us. However, the lecture argues that buzzers say that they do not tell the truth about products that is not true. According to the lecture, companies try to find people who use products of the buzzers do not like the advertisement and also you get the truth from buzzing.
In addition, the reading makes the arguments that they are private individuals by the buzzers. According to the reading, TV which displays advertisement, questionable claims are graded by the consumer but consumers being lobbies when they do not know. The lectures counter this point by stating that the reading's claims not true and the opposite of reading is true. Moreover, people always ask a question about prize, service and how long we use and they answer by using products.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that social relationship is affected by the buzzing and completely harmful and also it cause mistrust between people and general. The lecture refutes this claims by pointing out that if you believe that buzzing destroy civilization that is stupid. So, people should love products from buzzing and people can get more trust and experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e and the reading both discuss buzzing. While the reading states that many companies ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...zing and completely harmful and also it cause mistrust between people and general. Th...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'moreover', 'really', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248366013072 0.261695866417 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.196078431373 0.158904122519 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0555555555556 0.0723426182421 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0588235294118 0.0435111971325 135% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0326797385621 0.0277247811725 118% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107843137255 0.128828473217 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0490196078431 0.0370669169778 132% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.52493685514 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0228758169935 0.0208969081088 109% => OK
Particles: 0.00326797385621 0.00154638098197 211% => OK
Determiners: 0.111111111111 0.128158765124 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00980392156863 0.0158828679856 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0261437908497 0.0114777025283 228% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1700.0 1645.83664459 103% => OK
No of words: 280.0 271.125827815 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07142857143 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.414285714286 0.374372842146 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.314285714286 0.287516216867 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171428571429 0.187439937562 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0857142857143 0.113142543107 76% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52493685514 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.539623497131 95% => OK
Word variations: 50.5123706801 53.8517498576 94% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.7502111507 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2793516531 49.3711431718 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 132.220823453 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.7502111507 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 0.878197800319 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 51.4285714286 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.40909090909 1.90840788429 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.571805726758 0.549887131256 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132351014329 0.142949733639 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0668067624499 0.0787303798458 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.607430497657 0.631733273073 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.106013548346 0.139662658121 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.26499505992 0.266732575781 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081672528351 0.103435571967 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.468668572368 0.414875509568 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0831026718922 0.0530846634433 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.416933999518 0.40443939384 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788845555723 0.0528353158467 149% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.