TPO 21
In this set of materials, the reading passage states that genetic modified trees have a lot of advantages over unmodified ones. However, the lecturer finds all the benefits skeptical and explains that their disadvantages and costs are more and provides some evidence to refute mentioned benefits.
First of all, the author of the passage claims that modified trees are more resistant to difficult situations and can survive longer than unmodified counterparts. In contrast, the lecturer argues that modified trees are just resistant to some specific conditions and cannot tolerate new environments. For example, if we plant just genetically uniform trees, after the invasion of a new pest or change of the climate, all the trees would wipe out. Hence, this will damage to their population dramatically.
Furthermore, it is mentioned in the reading passage that modified trees support economic benefits and their products can satisfy farmers. On the contrary, the lecturer contends that there is hidden cost that the writer did not consider it. Farmers have to pay three times greater price for modified seed and according to the law every time they plant a new tree, they have to pay for it. So, it is not frugal for people to grow them.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that modified trees save the endangered native trees. Conversely, the lecturer claims that they grow more aggressive because of consuming most water and nutrition in the soil. In fact, they do not allow wild trees to use resources and consequently they cut out nature trees.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, for example, in contrast, in fact, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14229249012 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64832163104 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569169960474 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5228306647 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.076923077 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415296694161 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139156025895 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796322285246 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246499264612 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493531449752 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.