TPO 22
In the reading passage, the author claims that ethanol, which is produced from plants such as corn ang suger cane, should not be asccounted as a proper fuel instead fo gasoline in the United states by pointing out three reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in text, and states that indeed ethonal can be a great alternative() for gasoline. Therefore, she demonstrated some evidence to refure the problems mentioned in the reading.
At first, the author argues that substiruting() the ethonal will not solve the enviconmental problems related to the global warming. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that it is true that ethonal can add the global warming due to realising the carbone dioxide into the atmosphere, but grwoning the plants can reverse this process() nonetheless. Actually, the plants, for instance corn, absorb the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as a nutrition, hence it wipes out the carbon dioxide.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that production the ethonal in a large scale will end up with a substanial drop in availablefood sources for the other animals. On the other hand, the professor disputes this idea by clarifying that their source will not decrease. As a matter of fact, having made the ethanol from the psecific parts of the plants named Sellidium, which have not being eaten by animals, the famers will have food sources as abundance as before.
Finally, the author asserts that so high is the price of the ethanol without governmental tax support that it cannot compete with the low price of gasoline. The professor dissmisses this point by subscribing to the fact that despite this issue that tax subsidies make the ethonal cheap, if the ethonole produce in the large scales, its price will be decline enormously. In fact, the more available the ethanol become, the more people incline to use it and subsequently its pricce will reduce by 40%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0332326284 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6628228093 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564954682779 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6991216789 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.833333333 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5 7.06452816374 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312795033797 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947392947001 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640589172246 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167628398281 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552505328114 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.