TPO 22
In the reading passage, the author claims that ethanol, which is produced from plants such as corn and sugar cane, should not be accounted as a proper fuel instead of gasoline in the United States by pointing out three reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in text, and states that indeed ethanol can be a great alternative for gasoline. Therefore, she demonstrates some evidence to refute the problems mentioned in the reading.
At first, the author argues that substituting the ethanol will not solve the environmental problems related to the global warming. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that it is not true that ethanol can aggravate the global warming, although it releases the carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Having nurtured the plants, for instance corn, people reverse this process. Actually, the plants absorb the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as a nutrition, hence it wipes out the carbon dioxide.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that production the producing the ethanol in a large scale will end up with a substantial drop in available food sources for the other animals. On the other hand, the professor disputes this idea by clarifying that their source will not decrease. As a matter of fact, ethanol is made of cellulose which is the main element of call wall and have not being eaten by animals. Thus, having made the ethanol from Selenium, the famers will have food sources as abundant as before.
Finally, the author asserts that so high is the price of the ethanol without governmental tax support that it cannot compete in comparison to the low price of gasoline. The professor dismisses this point by subscribing to the fact however, tax subsidies make the ethanol cheap, if the ethanol produces in the large scales, its price will be decline enormously. In fact, the more available the ethanol become, the more people incline to use it. The latest research shows that by producing the ethanol 3 times greater than what is produces today, its price will be reduced by 40%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 355.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99436619718 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5967033867 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529577464789 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6971329122 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06452816374 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456913434564 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137809291022 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642226521889 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25471078538 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036239959164 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.