TPO 24
The reading passage claims that based on the discovery of the T.rex's leg bone, thereby exposing its insides to reveal materials that seem to be remains of blood vessels. However, the lecturer casts serious doubts on this claim by providing some counter-arguments and examples. He believes that all of this evidence which comes to this passage are skeptical.
On the first place, the lecturer contends that substances which recognized inside the channel are not necessary related to the blood cells. Actually, after animals die some bacteria live inside these channels, thus the substances that identified by scientists are the remnants of bacteria's colony. This, however, is contradicted to the reading passage mentions that the exciting finding was the organic material which represents the remain of the actual blood vessels of T.rax.
On the other hand, it is noted in the passage that microscopic examination of the various part of the inner bone revealed the presence of spheres that could be the remains of red blood cells. In contrast, he clearly states that researchers find spheres in another fossils record and other origins which do not relevant to blood cells, hence we can conclude that maybe this is the remain of minerals.
Finally, the speaker points out that collagen just lasts for 100 thousand years, so if we want to display that it remains from 70 million years ago, we reject the theory which is acceptable. As a consequence, we can determine that maybe this collagen comes from a human skin who carry the bone for researching, not for T,rex. Nonetheless, the text asserts that scientist performed a test on the dinosaur leg bone that showed that it contained collagen which remained from T.rax.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 430, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s the organic material which represents the remain of the actual blood vessels of T.rax. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 377, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ence we can conclude that maybe this is the remain of minerals. Finally, the speaker po...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 321, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , rex
...arry the bone for researching, not for T,rex. Nonetheless, the text asserts that sci...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, thus, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10954063604 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63838128886 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56890459364 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5972044274 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.454545455 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427623663009 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155310099923 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104627612137 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235782810044 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434848344409 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.