TPO 24-1
In the reading passage, it talks about the animal fossils and their relationship with the animal tissues, however, the professor holds different ideas and explains and refutes reading’s reasons.
To begin with, reading material illustrations that tiny channels in the bones of T.rex is contributed to the blood cells inner the bones, but, the professor has a variety opinion. He thinks that these holes can be because of colonies of some bacteria.
In addition, in the article we learn that red color material like iron remains in the bones and it proves the existing of blood. While, the professor demonstrates that there is no evidence to show red color related to the red minerals and should have another reason.
As a final point, contrary to the article that proposes the collagen is the one part of the bones, the professor describes that collagen can not endure more than 70 million years and collagen observation in the bones is impossible. Some laboratory mistake should have cause it.
In conclusion, the professor does not agree with the reading’s reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'mistakes'.
Suggestion: mistakes
...he bones is impossible. Some laboratory mistake should have cause it. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... agree with the reading's reasons.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.279411764706 0.261695866417 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.142156862745 0.158904122519 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0539215686275 0.0723426182421 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0147058823529 0.0435111971325 34% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0294117647059 0.0277247811725 106% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122549019608 0.128828473217 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0245098039216 0.0370669169778 66% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.748586119 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0245098039216 0.0208969081088 117% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.137254901961 0.128158765124 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0196078431373 0.0158828679856 123% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00980392156863 0.0114777025283 85% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1090.0 1645.83664459 66% => OK
No of words: 177.0 271.125827815 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1581920904 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 4.04852973271 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361581920904 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.293785310734 0.287516216867 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.214689265537 0.187439937562 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107344632768 0.113142543107 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.748586119 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587570621469 0.539623497131 109% => OK
Word variations: 52.9306312817 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0529801325 61% => OK
Sentence length: 22.125 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7550605214 49.3711431718 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 132.220823453 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 51.5035310734 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.28947368421 1.90840788429 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.655088607177 0.549887131256 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117072063029 0.142949733639 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0975623936869 0.0787303798458 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.734316960986 0.631733273073 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.262049663962 0.139662658121 188% => Sentences are changing often in a paragraphs.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.325934368333 0.266732575781 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16701508979 0.103435571967 161% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.328145050235 0.414875509568 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0807461837069 0.0530846634433 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.425665784052 0.40443939384 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119138486928 0.0528353158467 225% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 10.2958057395 49% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.