TPO 25
In the reading passage, the author claims that the vessel, which was found in Iraq in 1938, cannot be accounted as ancient electric battey by pointing out three reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text, and states some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that having not attached to any conductor, the vessle were not able to rpiduce electricity. The lecturer brings upthe idea that the absent of conductor cannot endorse anything. Indeed, thre are some other possibilities since the excavation operation had been done by the local people who certainly were not expert. Therefore, those people could have discovered them and throw them away. They overlooked the importance of those material since found them initerested.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the appearance similarities between the vessle in the Iran and another cylanders excavated n the ruins of Seleucia have demonstrated their similar usage. On the other hand, the professor, disoutes this point by clarifying that this resembalance can ratify their original usage but it does not prove its latter purposes nonetheless. Actually, it is plausible that after a while they found out that its exposition to some liquieds could have produced electricity. Subsequently, they altered its utilizing.
Finally, the author asserts that producing the electrucity was a futile activity in that era due to absence of any electrical device. The professor, though, dimisses this point by subscriging to the fact that probably, electiricty had some other invisible usages owing to its capabaliti to shock people. Consequently, some people might have magical purposes. Also, even in modern medical sicnence, electricity is used for stimulating the muscles and it could be another viable expalantion for using the elecricity on that period as well,
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39144736842 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82954208865 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9624748075 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.266666667 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269040955635 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770540166357 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447275789916 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143423167504 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349482231306 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 63.6247240618 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.