TPO 25
The reading passage claims that an archaeologist in Iraq discovered a set of clay jars contained copper cylinder. The archaeologist suggested that vessels could have been used for producing a small electricity but there is no evidence to prove the author claims. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author contends that those vessels should be connected to the conductors like metal wires in order to produce electricity. But no metal wires have been found on the site. In contrast, the lecturer underlines the fact that local people, might be discovered by ancient objects and there is a possibility that they did not interested in metal wires or they were not dexterous people. So, they might have thrown metal wires away.
Furthermore, the author embraces the idea that those vessels and copper cylinder may have been used for holding sacred scroll and there is nothing to do with electricity. On the contrary, the professor brings up the idea that although copper cylinder was used for holding the scroll, it has been used just for one purpose but adopted for another purpose.
Finally, as set forth by the author vessels and copper cylinder would have been useless and people did not know what to do with these objects. Conversely, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that ancient people used vessels and copper cylinder to produce a shock using for healing. As a matter of fact, this shock could stimulate muscles and cure people. Also, they used a mild shock and the invisible power for magic power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'interest'
Suggestion: interest
...here is a possibility that they did not interested in metal wires or they were not dextero...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd the invisible power for magic power.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, so, in contrast, as a matter of fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96282527881 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.464512994 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527881040892 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6881637153 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.692307692 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502937866434 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165543275425 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834078917355 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279188834505 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214575585371 0.0443174109184 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.