Tpo 26
In this set of material, the article and the lecture disagree on the merit of how the zebra mussel fish the native Eastern Europe fish threatened the North American habitats that recently reached it. The reading passage believes that this invasion of that muscle fish is irreversible and it is hard to cease. Furthermore, there are couple reasons behind that spending of the zebra fish. The writer assumes the uncontrolled invasion occurs by human ships transportation. Also, the zebra mussel fish can easy dominate new carried to habitat because they are faster in their reproductive ability, and the zebra mussel will presumably, inclining the overall resident fish population via competing with then on the natural plankton food. In contrary, the professor challenges the passage. He presents three reasons proves that all the ideas of the paragraph are skeptical. Following a brief interpretation of this perspective.
First of all, the reading passage asserts that human transportation ships help spread that zebra fish along the new canal that built to connect Europe waterway to the North American ocean, by carrying those fishes with the fresh water among the vessels to the new area. However, the listening passage refutes this view. He thinks that this assumption was correct in the past, but with the improvement in the recent technology, it much easier to control the water that carried with those ships and prevent such kind of diffusion. Moreover, the professor states that once those ships mix their fresh water with the salted ocean water, those mussels would not be able to survive.
Secondly, the author claims that those zebra mussel fish can adapt the new environmental and natural habitats and dominate it. In fact, the have higher reproductive rate. In the other hand, the lecturer rebuffs this reason of the passage. He suggests that this condition could be right at the beginning, but soon and for the birds; the local preditors, will be able to switch their feeding habits and feed on those new fish species which makes this area unlikely the best dominate area.
Last but not the least, the reading passage argues that those zebra mussel fish are capable of feeding on the plankton in the area and compete with native fish causing a drastic decline in their population. Nevertheless, the professor in the lecture opposes that arguments, he believes that those new species can help another kind of bottom fish and add an enormous positive impact in the region. Which feed on the zebra mussel depress material and in turn increase the plankton level.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
how the zebra mussel fish the native Eastern Europe fish threatened the North American habitats
how the zebra mussel fish, the native Eastern Europe fish, threatened the North American habitats
Sentence: He suggests that this condition could be right at the beginning, but soon and for the birds; the local preditors, will be able to switch their feeding habits and feed on those new fish species which makes this area unlikely the best dominate area.
Error: preditors Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
1.No. of Words: 424 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes. Don't need to list those arguments in the introduction paragraph.
2.Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 19 12
No. of Words: 424 250
No. of Characters: 2107 1200
No. of Different Words: 204 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.538 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.969 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.432 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 147 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 113 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.316 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.362 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.579 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.303 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.303 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.078 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous positive impact in the region. Which feed on the zebra mussel depress materia...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, in fact, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 22.412803532 201% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1373.03311258 157% => OK
No of words: 424.0 270.72406181 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08018867925 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51605736775 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 145.348785872 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495283018868 0.540411800872 92% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 419.366225166 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.2215025536 49.2860985944 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.368421053 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3157894737 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415761124961 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117220273072 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967028359757 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261453496145 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607678266382 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 63.6247240618 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.