TPO 28-1
The passage talks about the validity of the story that Peary has been in the North Pole. However, the professor holds a different idea and refuting reasons provided in the passage.
First, the author of the reading claims that committee of the National Geographic Society have find evidence of Peary's records and facilities, which prove Peary has been in Pole. While, the professor casts doubt on the reality of the conclusion of committee. She points that the committee had been included of Peary friends who had undertaken Peary financed support hence; their opinion cannot be accurate.
In addition, the passage says that Tom Avery has been a trip like Peary travel to the Pole under the similar condition and he indicates the possibility of Peary's successful travel to Pole. In contrast, professor argues that there are many differences between the two journey like weather condition as well as feeding method. In conclusion, Avery's trip cannot confirm Peary's success certainly.
As a final point, according to the reading, the photographs are taken by Peary prove the location of Peary on the Pole due to estimate of the sun position via shadows in the photographs. Whereas, the professor rebuts that statement by pointing out that after hundred years the pictures cannot be clear and quality of them have decreased during the long time. She states that results, which have gained due to these pictures, would not be sure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es, which prove Peary has been in Pole. While, the professor casts doubt on the reali...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...er condition as well as feeding method. In conclusion, Averys trip cannot confirm ...
^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...at statement by pointing out that after hundred years the pictures cannot be clear and ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.304182509506 0.261695866417 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.155893536122 0.158904122519 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0494296577947 0.0723426182421 68% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0304182509506 0.0435111971325 70% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0190114068441 0.0277247811725 69% => OK
Prepositions: 0.155893536122 0.128828473217 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0570342205323 0.0370669169778 154% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.50985918612 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0190114068441 0.0208969081088 91% => OK
Particles: 0.00380228136882 0.00154638098197 246% => OK
Determiners: 0.117870722433 0.128158765124 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0152091254753 0.0158828679856 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114068441065 0.0114777025283 99% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1437.0 1645.83664459 87% => OK
No of words: 236.0 271.125827815 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08898305085 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372881355932 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.283898305085 0.287516216867 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194915254237 0.187439937562 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122881355932 0.113142543107 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50985918612 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580508474576 0.539623497131 108% => OK
Word variations: 57.5814449816 53.8517498576 107% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 21.4545454545 21.7502111507 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2991890537 49.3711431718 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.636363636 132.220823453 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 21.7502111507 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.18181818182 0.878197800319 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 49.844375963 50.5018328374 99% => OK
Elegance: 2.51851851852 1.90840788429 132% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.719943697186 0.549887131256 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13213659993 0.142949733639 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.07412324639 0.0787303798458 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.64249339494 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.168375770172 0.139662658121 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.343748183612 0.266732575781 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184022481802 0.103435571967 178% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.403870211494 0.414875509568 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0559044831564 0.0530846634433 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.541200868275 0.40443939384 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524320467983 0.0528353158467 99% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.