In the given set of materials, the main topic centered on whether the Peary's claim about the journey to North Pole was genuine or not. While the author has focused on the three justifications to advocate his remarks, the speaker in the follow-up material challenged those points in a number of ways.
The first point mentioned in the article is that the geographic committee have validated the proposed records of Peary's observations by examining them. However, this was questioned by the lecturer as she stated that this committee's members were his close friends who founded the expenditure of his trip. Conspicuously, it made their investigation not to be authentic.
Moreover, according to the essay, Avery's same circumstance in his North Pole trek apparently showed the feasibility of the 37-day Peary's travel. Nonetheless, the orator asserted that due to some differences in their trek such as distinct weather, or less sled weigh might cause this comparison false.
Last but not least, the writer declared that the token photography and its exact position of the sunlight were the most effective reason to substantiate his claim. Conversely, according to the lecturer, primitive camera and obscurity of the photo were the main causes to reject his declaration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...oned by the lecturer as she stated that this committees members were his close frien...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['apparently', 'but', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242152466368 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.143497757848 0.158904122519 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0941704035874 0.0723426182421 130% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0493273542601 0.0435111971325 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0538116591928 0.0277247811725 194% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116591928251 0.128828473217 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0493273542601 0.0370669169778 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9104672273 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0358744394619 0.0208969081088 172% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.139013452915 0.128158765124 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00448430493274 0.0158828679856 28% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00448430493274 0.0114777025283 39% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1277.0 1645.83664459 78% => OK
No of words: 203.0 271.125827815 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.29064039409 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04852973271 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.379310344828 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28078817734 0.287516216867 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.226600985222 0.187439937562 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.162561576355 0.113142543107 144% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9104672273 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660098522167 0.539623497131 122% => OK
Word variations: 70.5877861103 53.8517498576 131% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5555555556 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0172362571 49.3711431718 59% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.888888889 132.220823453 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 0.878197800319 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 50.6343732895 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.65454545455 1.90840788429 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.643379139507 0.549887131256 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122093198563 0.142949733639 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0869977510658 0.0787303798458 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.695658647537 0.631733273073 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.179889000522 0.139662658121 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.337490180336 0.266732575781 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123679076463 0.103435571967 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.360289242657 0.414875509568 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0397250286195 0.0530846634433 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.467304127263 0.40443939384 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344064631144 0.0528353158467 65% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.62251655629 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 4.0 10.2958057395 39% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.