TPO 31
Both the reading and lecturer try to discuss about the interpretation from the lines which attend in Sinosauropetryx dinasor. Although the reading states that this lines not represented the existence of feathers in this type of dinasors, the lecturer disagrees with them all and brings three reasons to refute the reading's ideas.
At first, the author argues that according the fact that the structure on the fossils probably were formed after the Sinosauropteryx dinasor dead. In the contrary, the professor reject this idea due to the fact that in this area, the evidence of functional stractures were found not fiber. Additionally, in the burried place, there were not the evidence of other animal's decomposition. So, this lines indicate that theis dinasors have feathers.
Furthermore, the reading aserts that researchers can not recognize the type of dinasor's anatomy which this lines belongs it, if this lines belongs to the this dinasors. On the other hand, the lecturer bring the idea that this reason is highly dubious by releasing this fact that there are some significant chemical differences between frills and feathers. The frills do not have the burdy content, However the feathers have this. Therefore, during the fact that in the fossil's analysis there are some burdy content, Consequently, this lines related to the feathers not frills.
Finally, the passage underlines that this lines were in the backbone of the fossils of Sinosauropteryx dinasors and these may be useless. So, this proof is in contradict by utilizing the feathers by animals for increasing temprature and flying help. In contrast, the professor dismisses this idea due to the fact that there are some evidences in this lines about orange and other colours and some birds have this colours in their feathers. Therfore, this lines belong to the feathers of this dinasors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...e, there were not the evidence of other animals decomposition. So, this lines indicate ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...es belongs it, if this lines belongs to the this dinasors. On the other hand, the lectur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fossils'' or 'fossil's'?
Suggestion: fossils'; fossil's
... Therefore, during the fact that in the fossils analysis there are some burdy content, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 346, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e fact that there are some evidences in this lines about orange and other colours an...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'in contrast', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.274924471299 0.261695866417 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.12084592145 0.158904122519 76% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0453172205438 0.0723426182421 63% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0543806646526 0.0435111971325 125% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00906344410876 0.0277247811725 33% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138972809668 0.128828473217 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0302114803625 0.0370669169778 82% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73950406018 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0211480362538 0.0208969081088 101% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.190332326284 0.128158765124 149% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00604229607251 0.0158828679856 38% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00604229607251 0.0114777025283 53% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1858.0 1645.83664459 113% => OK
No of words: 299.0 271.125827815 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21404682274 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361204013378 0.374372842146 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.290969899666 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.214046822742 0.187439937562 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130434782609 0.113142543107 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73950406018 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464882943144 0.539623497131 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.2137728906 53.8517498576 84% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.3571428571 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.30176597 49.3711431718 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.714285714 132.220823453 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.785714285714 0.878197800319 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 50.4541328237 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 2.40983606557 1.90840788429 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.699922234736 0.549887131256 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.185128236764 0.142949733639 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0925350718067 0.0787303798458 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.672312120964 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150161301469 0.139662658121 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.392979446498 0.266732575781 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116483208695 0.103435571967 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.599703987846 0.414875509568 145% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0451623452614 0.0530846634433 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.585073192734 0.40443939384 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379874503269 0.0528353158467 72% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 3.1766004415 252% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.