Although the author provides three main reasons to support the fact that Sinosauropteryx, a fossil of a dinosaur found in China did not have any feathers, the professor contradicts these ideas and brings up three counter points to refute them all.
First, the author argues that the fossil preserved in volcanic ash has been degraded and it resulted misinterpreting of the lines on the fossil which are supposed to be its feather. However, the professor takes the view that the decomposition of other animal's fossils preserved in volcanic ash indicates their structure correctly. Thus, it leads this result that the Sinosauropteryx ' s fossil are valid enough to represent the possible feather.
Second, the author states that the scholars cannot surely state that these parts of dinasaur's structure are their feathers due to the fact that they have some frills, a fan-shaped lines on their bodies. On the contrary, the professor holds the view that scientists have investigated the chemical differences between feathers and thrills which show that feathers structure contain a kind of protein that have been found in the Sinosauropteryx's fossil. So, the presence of protein distinguishes that they are not thrills.
Third, the author claims that their functions are not only for flying but also fot thermoregulation which these functions are not represented on their bodies due to the fact that lines in fossils are placed on their backbones and tails. However, the professor believes that their feathers had other functions such as displacing function. For example some kind of birds use their feathers for mating. In addition, it has been discovered recently that their feathers were colorful which indicate that they have been used for displacing activities, another kind of feather function.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ads this result that the Sinosauropteryx s fossil are valid enough to represent t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, thus, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3298245614 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85583859779 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505263157895 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8193118939 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.090909091 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358053902105 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135353470851 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621966749204 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2123813216 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640862790237 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.