TPO 32
Both the reading and speaking try to discuss about the origin of the sound which the Russian soldiers heard in 1960s. Although the reading states that there are three various theories to define the origin of the sound and this sound does not belong to frogs, the lecturer refutes them all and believes that the ideas mentioned by reading are highly erroneous and bring three reason to refute them.
At first, the reading asserts the idea that the male orcas whales have the similar sound to the strange noise which was heard by the soldiers when they wanted to attract the female whales. Therefore, these odd noises belonged to them. On the contrary, the speaker rejects this idea due to the fact that this type of whales lived in the surface of the ocean, but the sounds were from the deep part of the water and the whales' sounds were not able to be detected if the detector was in deep side of the ocean. So, these noises did not belongs them.
Furthermore, the author explains the other theory that those strange sounds were generated by giant squid according to the fact that the noises of this type of animals cannot be detected and because of their complicated skeleton, it is possible they were able to release these sounds. On the other hand, the lecturer bring the reason that this idea is highly questionable due to the fact that these sounds were heard in 1960s, but reported in 1970s and the detector operated in 1980. This kind of animal attended in that time there and if these noises belonged them the detector must be heard them.
Finally, the passage argues that some foreign countries' military probably made these odd sounds unintentionally during the employing their specified technologies. Conversely, the professor dismisses this idea by this concept that these strange sounds included moving and changing the direction quickly, but there were not movement and different direction states in the other countries submarines military. In addition, if the sounds created by the militaries, there should exist the engines sounds, nothing was heard. Consequently, these sounds did not belong to the submarine militaries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
... sound which the Russian soldiers heard in 1960s. Although the reading states that there...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'orcas'' or 'orca's'?
Suggestion: orcas'; orca's
... reading asserts the idea that the male orcas whales have the similar sound to the st...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 533, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'belong'
Suggestion: belong
... of the ocean. So, these noises did not belongs them. Furthermore, the author explains...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
...o the fact that these sounds were heard in 1960s, but reported in 1970s and the detector...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1970s'.
Suggestion: in the 1970s
...ounds were heard in 1960s, but reported in 1970s and the detector operated in 1980. This...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'in addition', 'kind of', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217391304348 0.261695866417 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.166240409207 0.158904122519 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.074168797954 0.0723426182421 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0460358056266 0.0435111971325 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0281329923274 0.0277247811725 101% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115089514066 0.128828473217 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0511508951407 0.0370669169778 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.36935000463 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0332480818414 0.0208969081088 159% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.171355498721 0.128158765124 134% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0076726342711 0.0158828679856 48% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0076726342711 0.0114777025283 67% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2137.0 1645.83664459 130% => OK
No of words: 360.0 271.125827815 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93611111111 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.04852973271 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361111111111 0.374372842146 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.238888888889 0.287516216867 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.155555555556 0.187439937562 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0805555555556 0.113142543107 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36935000463 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.539623497131 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.3424692105 53.8517498576 90% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.6923076923 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.6351025977 49.3711431718 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.384615385 132.220823453 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6923076923 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 51.5811965812 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.59574468085 1.90840788429 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.756911657119 0.549887131256 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.156694911477 0.142949733639 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106468523191 0.0787303798458 135% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.635491709811 0.631733273073 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.236613686611 0.139662658121 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.376351794427 0.266732575781 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173865427235 0.103435571967 168% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.603708766102 0.414875509568 146% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0593865183014 0.0530846634433 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.592546080112 0.40443939384 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664681296289 0.0528353158467 126% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.