TPO 33-1
The passage talks about the possible theories about concepts and intention of discovered carved stone balls in Scotland. The author of the reading claims three different theories; however, the professor holds a various idea and refuting reasons provided in the passage.
First, the reading mentions that stone balls have used as a weapons in hunting or fighting. It indicates that cord connected with stones and grooves on the surface of stones validate this theory. While, the professor casts doubt on the reality of the using stone balls in purpose of prey or battle. He points that if stone ball have applied for this aim we should see trace of damaging on their surface; whereas, not only there is not any crushed stone but also no stone with crack on its surface has observed.
In addition, the passage says that people for weighting food or other crops were utilized stone ball. According to the reading because all of the stone balls have same shape and were same. In contrast, the professor argues that the alike shape cannot demonstrate that stones were for weighting purpose. He points that stones are made by different stone types, therefore, as a result they will have various weight due to their density difference.
As a final point, with attention to the reading, another possible theory about stone balls could be social purpose usage. The detailed design of stones justifies this statement. On the contrary, the listening rebuts that theory by pointing out that there is no evidence which illustrate the stones were applied in communities object. The professor notes that if the stones were used for this target, we were expected to find any proof in the temples or people's graves of that era.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a weapon' or simply 'weapons'?
Suggestion: a weapon; weapons
... mentions that stone balls have used as a weapons in hunting or fighting. It indicates th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... ball. According to the reading because all of the stone balls have same shape and were sa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'while', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.290220820189 0.261695866417 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.157728706625 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0599369085174 0.0723426182421 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0220820189274 0.0435111971325 51% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0283911671924 0.0277247811725 102% => OK
Prepositions: 0.157728706625 0.128828473217 122% => OK
Participles: 0.0599369085174 0.0370669169778 162% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.35009685905 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.01261829653 0.0208969081088 60% => OK
Particles: 0.00315457413249 0.00154638098197 204% => OK
Determiners: 0.123028391167 0.128158765124 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.01261829653 0.0158828679856 79% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00630914826498 0.0114777025283 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1718.0 1645.83664459 104% => OK
No of words: 288.0 271.125827815 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96527777778 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.368055555556 0.374372842146 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.267361111111 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.170138888889 0.187439937562 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.100694444444 0.113142543107 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35009685905 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548611111111 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 56.1999372814 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5714285714 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6310897285 49.3711431718 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 132.220823453 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 47.3075396825 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 2.43939393939 1.90840788429 128% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.715030136829 0.549887131256 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107734910382 0.142949733639 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0586471887094 0.0787303798458 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.578680893328 0.631733273073 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129951219928 0.139662658121 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.317253791234 0.266732575781 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867253238951 0.103435571967 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.379900793242 0.414875509568 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0687809313408 0.0530846634433 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.515755860678 0.40443939384 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419802238861 0.0528353158467 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.