tpo 34
The reading provides three different reasons for extinction of sea cows, the enormous marine animal which lived in the water next to the coast of Siberia. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author argues that over hunting of this huge animal by the Siberian people could be the main cause of this problem. Conversely, the lecturer casts doubt on this idea by stating that sea cow was a huge animal with 9 meter long and over 10 tones weight, so, Siberian people did not need to kill all of them for their food and a couple of them could provide the food of these people for months.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that changing the ecosystems factors and whether conditions might cause this extinction. In the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that if the ecosystems disturbance were so sever, it could have affected other animal’s population and created some sort of problems for them. However, the researchers showed that the population of other animals did not change in this area. As a result, this could not be the source of the problem.
Finally, the reading asserts that European sailors who hunt this animal for its precious fur could be the main reason of this extinction. In contrast, the speakers dismisses this issue due to the fact that when the European traders reached this area the population of this animal has been already declined. He also states that some evidence clearly depict that the population of this animal was much more greater 100 years before arriving of the European people, but, because of unknown reason it decreased tremendously after that. So, whatever this thing was, it should be considered as the main cause of this huge extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ecosystems'' or 'ecosystem's'?
Suggestion: ecosystems'; ecosystem's
...ofessor underlines the fact that if the ecosystems disturbance were so sever, it could hav...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'greater' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: greater
... the population of this animal was much more greater 100 years before arriving of the Europe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'in contrast', 'sort of', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239520958084 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.122754491018 0.158904122519 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0748502994012 0.0723426182421 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0538922155689 0.0435111971325 124% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0299401197605 0.0277247811725 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140718562874 0.128828473217 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0179640718563 0.0370669169778 48% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.4588353866 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0119760479042 0.0208969081088 57% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.164670658683 0.128158765124 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0209580838323 0.0158828679856 132% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0119760479042 0.0114777025283 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1779.0 1645.83664459 108% => OK
No of words: 301.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91029900332 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.338870431894 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255813953488 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169435215947 0.187439937562 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0863787375415 0.113142543107 76% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4588353866 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544850498339 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.4430840343 53.8517498576 105% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0833333333 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9964099661 49.3711431718 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.25 132.220823453 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 50.6647286822 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.92753623188 1.90840788429 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.702865190376 0.549887131256 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.164692796625 0.142949733639 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0644333263296 0.0787303798458 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.703685841618 0.631733273073 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.085010326823 0.139662658121 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.378102281367 0.266732575781 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897262736172 0.103435571967 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.460355403352 0.414875509568 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0882181950753 0.0530846634433 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.525994926029 0.40443939384 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013323289466 0.0528353158467 25% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.