tpo 41
The reading passage states that power companies which use coal in their process argue new regulations for handling and stroring coal ash and provides three reasons fot their argument. However, the professor claims that the new regulations are necessary and refutes each of reasons.
First, the article posits that there are effective environmetal regulations. In contrast, the lecturer states that the existence regulations are not realy sufficient. She explains that these regulations are only for new disposal ponds and lands and the old companies have no liner materials in their lands and in the lands that do not have controling systems (liner materials) leakage of pollution to soil will contaminate the drinking water. So the regulations should be for both of old and new companies.
Second, the reading claims that new regulations might discourage the recycling of coal ash. The professor refutes this point by stating that it will not necessarily mean that consumers will not use recycled coal ash. She gives an example of mercury which subjected to very strict regulations to illustrate this. She says that after implementation of new regulations consumers have had few concerns about mercury and this results can happen for coal ash too.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that new regulation will increase the disposal cost which leads to increase of price of electricity. However, the professor casts doubt this view and contends that the environmental benefits of new regulations will worth extra cost. She explains that investing money for doing of new regulations will be about 15 bilion dollars which is only 1 percent increasment in consumers bill and it is not high price for saving the environement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tends that the environmental benefits of new regulations will worth extra cost. S...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24909747292 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7838312691 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509025270758 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7411854844 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.846153846 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455565200192 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168260610654 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107193330377 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285208736675 0.162205337803 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820315434543 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.