The reading passage contends that there are three solutions which prevent injuries to birds by glasses as building material. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the lecturer questions the validity of the reading passage that replacing the regular and clear glass with one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction is a solution. This is attributed to the fact that even if the regular glasses replaced with one-way glass, birds could not recognize replaced glasses. In addition, the replaced glasses reflect every object they face, such as sky and themselves, thus causing them fly into the glasses. Thus, the reading passage’s first solution is invalid.
Moreover, the lecturer cast doubt on the point in the reading passage that painting colorful lines or other designs on regular window glass could resolve the problem. This is because it is true that people would recognize the window glass; however, birds would not recognize the presence of that. And they would consider as dark hole when they see the glass because it is too dark for them. Consequently, the reading passage’s second solution is refuted.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the solution in the reading passage that creating an artificial magnetic held could guide birds away from buildings. It is obvious that although birds have a natural ability to sense Earth’s magnetic fields, they are not able to take advantage of the ability. This is due to the fact that they are able to use that ability when they migrate in long distance, not short distance. In addition, when they fly in short distance, they utilize their eyes for navigate their directions. As a result, the reading passage’s last solution is contradicted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage contends that there ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... points that contradict this argument. First of all, the lecturer questions the...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sage's first solution is invalid. Moreover, the lecturer cast doubt on the...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age's second solution is refuted. Last but not least, the lecturer disagre...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'in addition', 'in short', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24926686217 0.261695866417 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.134897360704 0.158904122519 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.099706744868 0.0723426182421 138% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0439882697947 0.0435111971325 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0469208211144 0.0277247811725 169% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108504398827 0.128828473217 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0234604105572 0.0370669169778 63% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62566716513 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0175953079179 0.0208969081088 84% => OK
Particles: 0.00293255131965 0.00154638098197 190% => OK
Determiners: 0.108504398827 0.128158765124 85% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0175953079179 0.0158828679856 111% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0205278592375 0.0114777025283 179% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1812.0 1645.83664459 110% => OK
No of words: 293.0 271.125827815 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1843003413 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365187713311 0.374372842146 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.331058020478 0.287516216867 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.211604095563 0.187439937562 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105802047782 0.113142543107 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62566716513 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508532423208 0.539623497131 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.4992271047 53.8517498576 94% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5333333333 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6890199159 49.3711431718 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8 132.220823453 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.06666666667 0.878197800319 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 52.6391353811 50.5018328374 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.68831168831 1.90840788429 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.611129769331 0.549887131256 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.166944839472 0.142949733639 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.110897992877 0.0787303798458 141% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.567999523723 0.631733273073 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118441847021 0.139662658121 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.254156480181 0.266732575781 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996014734078 0.103435571967 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.412883569848 0.414875509568 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0776071228583 0.0530846634433 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.421760427619 0.40443939384 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07442543889 0.0528353158467 141% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.