The reading passage contends that there are three theories about how agnostids behaved. On the other hand, the lecturer brings about several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the lecturer questions the theory in the reading passage that the agnostids may have hunted smaller animals as free-swimming predators. This is because most arthropods have well-developed eyes to prey on. Most powerful ability to detect prey is vision. However, the agnostids were blind when detecting prey. Even though there is no evidence of this function, they might have another special sensory, except eyes. Thus, the reading passage‘s first theory is invalid.
Moreover, the lecturer casts doubt on the theory in the reading passage that the agnostids might be dweller on the sea floor. This is because it is true most of arthropods are unable to move fast and far in a long distance. And also they move slowly within the small geographic area. However, the agnostids were able to move fast and far in a large distance. It is unusual compared with other anthropods. Consequently, the reading passage’s second theory is refuted.
Last but not least, another possibility of the agnostids is parasites, having lived on primitive fish or even on other, large arthropods. It is obvious that it is true that many species of arthropods live as parasites. However, a myriad of the species exist in the world. Even agnostids seems to be primitive arthropods, there is exception for the arthropods’ ancestors and no evidence of this theory based on their fossil remains. As a result, the reading passage’s last theory is contradicted
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the arthropods') or simply say ''most arthropods''.
Suggestion: most of the arthropods; most arthropods
...e sea floor. This is because it is true most of arthropods are unable to move fast and far in a lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssage's last theory is contradicted
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23642172524 0.261695866417 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.14696485623 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102236421725 0.0723426182421 141% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0607028753994 0.0435111971325 140% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0223642172524 0.0277247811725 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115015974441 0.128828473217 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0287539936102 0.0370669169778 78% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88730788345 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0159744408946 0.0208969081088 76% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.111821086262 0.128158765124 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00958466453674 0.0158828679856 60% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00958466453674 0.0114777025283 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1646.0 1645.83664459 100% => OK
No of words: 265.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21132075472 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388679245283 0.374372842146 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.301886792453 0.287516216867 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207547169811 0.187439937562 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143396226415 0.113142543107 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88730788345 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51320754717 0.539623497131 95% => OK
Word variations: 49.4088615733 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0529801325 146% => OK
Sentence length: 13.9473684211 21.7502111507 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5990088405 49.3711431718 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6315789474 132.220823453 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9473684211 21.7502111507 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.789473684211 0.878197800319 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 44.1360476663 50.5018328374 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.65277777778 1.90840788429 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.625440970995 0.549887131256 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106460633586 0.142949733639 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0780056680009 0.0787303798458 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.480663869851 0.631733273073 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129628760456 0.139662658121 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221835696408 0.266732575781 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106978860737 0.103435571967 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.400369733488 0.414875509568 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0921127272316 0.0530846634433 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.450043587846 0.40443939384 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576285012419 0.0528353158467 109% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.26048565121 235% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.