Both the reading and listening material concentrate on the genuine of the silver coin. The passage offers three reasons why it is fake. However, the lecturer, has a different view that it is not fake, but genious evidence.
To beging with, the reading material argues that it is too far away form Norse Settlements that can suggest that it has no real connection. But, the professor disagrees with this reason. She then points out that we have found other objects which are even more far away. So, it shows the Native Americans had an interest in traveling long distance. Thus, this cannot be used to be a powerful reason.
Then, according to the writer, we have not found any other coins. This is also argued by the professor, because it is not necessary. The Native Americans truly reached the Norse, and they brought they money back. So, there is no doubt why we could not found other coins.
In addition, the author illustrates that ths silver coin is useless for them. In fact, the Native Americans did not use them as money, however, it does not mean it has no other uses. To be more concise, they understood the usefulness of the silver coins as jewllery. In the end, the coin can be used for trade that the last reason is also unncessary to approve the author's oppoint.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, in addition, in fact, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64473684211 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35553267104 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587719298246 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1343084374 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.1875 110.228320801 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.25 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323760587474 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928045613095 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538884148349 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174300050869 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520797057259 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 13.3589403974 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.04 12.2367328918 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.