tpo 45
In the reading, the author proposes some reasons for supporting the theory that fossil structures were not created by bees. However, the lecturer is critical about what the author asserts and refutes three reasons correspondingly.
First, as put forth by the author, the earliest preserved body of a bees is only as half as old as the fossilized structure discoverd in Arizona. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes this reason, mentioning that there should have been a special tree which produces resin to preserve the bees' body adn because these trees began to grow in that area later than the bees, the preserved body of bees discoverd 100 million years later.
Second, the author points out that, bees and plants evolved in close mutually relationshi and since no plant or flower existed in the area untill 125 million years ago, bees coudl have not existed before that time. The author, neveretheless, casts doubt on this reason, metioning that before the appearance of flower and plants in that area, bees could have eat other species such as ferns. With the advent of flowers they have been evolved and adopted to the new food.
Third, as it has been claimed by he author, the fossilized structures lack spiral caps which is a vital part of moder bees's nest. While the lecturer does not consider this reason plausible and posits that chemical evidence found by scienctist suggest that the material ancient bees may have used for bulding a nest is a water-proof material which is quite distinctive from the modern bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a bee' or simply 'bees'?
Suggestion: a bee; bees
... author, the earliest preserved body of a bees is only as half as old as the fossilize...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...been a special tree which produces resin to preserve the bees body adn because t...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roduces resin to preserve the bees body adn because these trees began to grow in...
^^
Line 6, column 359, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...nd plants in that area, bees could have eat other species such as ferns. With the a...
^^^
Line 10, column 31, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'by the author'?
Suggestion: by the author
...d. Third, as it has been claimed by he author, the fossilized structures lack spiral ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 37, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'authors'.
Suggestion: authors
... Third, as it has been claimed by he author, the fossilized structures lack spiral ...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the material ancient bees may have used for bulding a nest is a water-proof mate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, so, third, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96525096525 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42553412957 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590733590734 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.7278504634 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.888888889 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7777777778 21.698381199 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0859720047064 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396792554404 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263681901821 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515950592742 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155034026314 0.0443174109184 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.