TPO-45
In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that there are some doubts that the fossil structures that have been found in Arizona were related to bees. While in the listening the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and believes that it is quite possible that the fossils were related to ancients bees and the arguments present in the text are not convincing.
First of all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that there is not any fossils evidence of actual bees date to 200 million years ago. However, the professor claims that if we could not find any bees fossils does not means that bees did not live at this time. Bees' body could be fossilized if it was trap into the sticky material called resin, which produced by some special type of trees. In 200 million years ago these type of trees were not widespread.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that because in 200 million years ago, the flowering plants did not exist so bees could not exist too. She says that it is possible that bees at this time feeding on the non-flowering plants like fern and pantries and during the evolution process they change their feeding habit from non-flowering plants to flowering ones.
Finally, in the text, it is stated that we cannot prove that the fossil structures are related to bees. The professor subscribes that bees produced some waterproof chemicals and scientists find these waterproof chemicals in the fossil structures too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...ould not find any bees fossils does not means that bees did not live at this time. Be...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82745098039 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41863837953 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498039215686 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2302930988 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.1 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926919724303 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413447221072 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220747440463 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565246277787 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167279388525 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 53.8541721854 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.