The reading passage contends that there are three points about the explanation why a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the lecturer questions the validity of the point in the reading passage that the early earth’s greater supply of oxygen resulted in the large size of the animals in the past. This is attributed to the fact that volcanic activities were actively happened with spreading poisonous gases on the air. It made them difficult to survive and breathe. And the suggestion held by some biologists that oxygen-rich environment is also wrong. Thus, the reading passage’s first point is invalid.
Moreover, the lecturer casts doubt on the point made by the reading passage that all species have been provided plenty of nutrients by the abundant plant life on the early earth. This is because even it is true that the abundant plant existed in the past, nutrients from the plant life was not plentiful. According to the research from fossil and ancient plant life, they would have scarce nutrient for providing plenty of nutrients. And their atmosphere also was contaminated. Consequently, the reading passage’s second point is contradicted.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the point made in the reading passage that a great many animals of the past was stimulated their growth by the early earth’s warm climate, which is addressed by some researchers. It is obvious that their huge bodies were disadvantages for themselves. This is because animals’ larger bodies require more food than smaller one, which makes the body temperature is raised. In order to maintain their temperature, they had to regulate body temperature by cooling themselves immediately. It was difficult for animals with huge bodies to reduce their temperature. As a result, with such reasoning, the reading passage’s last point is refuted.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261333333333 0.261695866417 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.146666666667 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101333333333 0.0723426182421 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0346666666667 0.0435111971325 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.04 0.0277247811725 144% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122666666667 0.128828473217 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0506666666667 0.0370669169778 137% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87651480088 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.016 0.0208969081088 77% => OK
Particles: 0.00266666666667 0.00154638098197 172% => OK
Determiners: 0.117333333333 0.128158765124 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00266666666667 0.0158828679856 17% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106666666667 0.0114777025283 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2010.0 1645.83664459 122% => OK
No of words: 321.0 271.125827815 118% => OK
Chars per words: 6.26168224299 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361370716511 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.295950155763 0.287516216867 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.205607476636 0.187439937562 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140186915888 0.113142543107 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87651480088 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504672897196 0.539623497131 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.5410759872 53.8517498576 96% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.8333333333 21.7502111507 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2295728638 49.3711431718 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 132.220823453 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 21.7502111507 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.722222222222 0.878197800319 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 47.4283489097 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.96385542169 1.90840788429 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.660385396849 0.549887131256 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133025843851 0.142949733639 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0817711244298 0.0787303798458 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.508670848924 0.631733273073 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.189795625956 0.139662658121 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.250955703744 0.266732575781 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138293397197 0.103435571967 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.479688663037 0.414875509568 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0721525874466 0.0530846634433 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.494940909735 0.40443939384 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658953494162 0.0528353158467 125% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.