Both the passage and the lecture relate to theory about the existence of bees on earth as early as 200 million years ago. On the one hand, the passage mentions three reasons opposing this theory, while the lecture refutes all these reasons by saying that the skeptics' arguments are not convincing.
First of all, the passage states that the fossil of the earliest preserved body of a bee date to 100 million years ago. In contrast, the lecture disagrees with this opinion by saying that the bees could not be preserved as fossil at that time. Since there were no trees to produce resin which is a type of sticky liquid at that period. The trees were common later.
In addition, the passage goes on to say that bees depended on flowering plants as source of food while flowering plants did not exist in that period. However, the lecture emphasizes that the bees might be feed on non-flowering plants that have existed before flowering plants.
Last but not least, the passage asserts that the structures of the chamber nest that was found is different from the modern bees' nest chambers. In fact, this difference explains that early structures were created by other insects not bees. Conversely, the lecture disputes this point by claiming that both structure have used the same water proofing material. This fact holds that the early structures certainly were made by bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ot be preserved as fossil at that time. Since there were no trees to produce resin wh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92796610169 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36713514292 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546610169492 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1709422642 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9166666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107635094259 0.272083759551 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461164166238 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276675524721 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0630946491229 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018215164974 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.