The reading states that earlier animals were obviously larger than than they are today and the author states 3 explanations to prove these states. However, the speaker contradicts all of the statements below
First, the reading states that, early animals were large because of great amount of oxygen and oxygen-rich environment makes products and species larger then today, However the speaker tells us that, in the past, oxygen levels was not as much as today due to volcanic activity. As you all know, volcanoes generate toxic to atmosphere and volcanic activities was widespread in the past.
Second, the author asserts that there were abundant plants on the world in order to consume by animals and more foods made them larger. This transferred genetically over generations and adequate food supply makes animal bigger over time. The speaker, however, this statement was true but they were low grade of nutrients. Researchers say that ancient plant was scarce due to lower oxygen level and foods were contaminant.
Finally, The reading tells us that early earth’s warm climate make growth, animal did not spend their energy to warm up. However, the lecturer is not favor of this idea because smallest species and people live in warm area. Large body creates more temperature to live and having large body is disadvantage in warm places. Animals cool off body in order keep body temperature in balance through consume food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: than
...t earlier animals were obviously larger than than they are today and the author states 3 ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tates. However, the speaker contradicts all of the statements below First, the reading st...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'larger than'?
Suggestion: larger than
... environment makes products and species larger then today, However the speaker tells us tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...nment makes products and species larger then today, However the speaker tells us tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16738197425 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47639113068 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587982832618 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0283209336 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.454545455 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354865238194 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126760620314 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615727913901 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200353214996 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421697760894 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.