tpo 47
The reading passage claims that there are several arguments which large pterosaurs were not capable of powered flight. However, the lecturer casts serious doubts on this claim by presenting counter-arguments and examples. She believes that non of these proofs are convincing.
On the first place, She contends that pterosaurs had high metabolism by evidence that discover from their fossils, thus like other warm-blooded animals their body covered by dens hair coloring due to keep their body temperature high also made them warm, therefore they could supply energy in order to fly. This, however, is contradicted to the reading passage mentions that ancient reptiles such as pterosaurs were probably cold-blooded and unable to produce a lot of energy.
On the other hand, it is noted in the passage that pterosaurs were so heavy that they would not have been able to flat their wings. In contrast the professor states that base on the anatomical body gesture of pterosaurs, they unusually had low weight due to their bones structured hollow instead of solid shape, as consequence maybe they have large body though they had low weight, by this advance they flap their wings conveniently and fly.
Finally, the speaker points out that birds and pterosaurs are really different from each other thanks to birds have 2 legs, hence when they want to fly they push on 2 legs despite pterosaurs had 4 limbs additionally they pushed these 4 limbs on the ground, so they did not face to any trouble during jumping or running. Nonetheless, the text asserts that large pterosaurs had small and weak muscles which did not allow them to run fast or jump enough to launch themselves into the air.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... have been able to flat their wings. In contrast the professor states that base on the a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sually had low weight due to their bones structured hollow instead of solid shape...
^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, hence when they want to fly they push on 2 legs despite pterosaurs had 4 limbs...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03558718861 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59747474282 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604982206406 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.6437113535 49.2860985944 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.222222222 110.228320801 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2222222222 21.698381199 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2222222222 7.06452816374 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414395952235 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165114269882 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10236267747 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222217610558 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313536772007 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.