In this set of materials, the reading passage explores the impossibility of Pterosaurs' capability of powered flight, and the professor's lecture deals with the same topic. However, she casts doubts on these arguments, and in the lecture, she provides three specific points to substantiate her opinion.
To begin with, although the reading passage suggests that Pterosaurs have slow metabolism since they were likely cold-blooded, the professor argues in the lecture that Pterosaurs were warm-blooded animals rather than cold-blooded animals. This is because according to the fossil record, their body were covered with fur-like hairs, which were used for maintaining body temperature, and this indicates that they were warm-blooded animals with sufficient energy for flying.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that Pterosaurs were too heavy to have the ability to fly, the professor contends that their bones were in fact hollow and light. She supports this point with the fact that the hollow bones allow them to flap wings fast enough to fly in the air. Clearly, professor's argument refutes its counterpart in the reading passage.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that the back leg muscles of Pterosaurs were too weak to be used for launching themselves into the air, whereas the professor asserts that Pterosaurs were different from birds which used two limps for running and jumping in order to gain speed for launching into the air. Then she explains that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that Pterosaurs actually used four legs instead of two limps; as a result, using four legs enable them jump high enough off the ground so that they could fly.
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'finally', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'whereas', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23569023569 0.261695866417 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.175084175084 0.158904122519 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0639730639731 0.0723426182421 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.047138047138 0.0435111971325 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.047138047138 0.0277247811725 170% => OK
Prepositions: 0.154882154882 0.128828473217 120% => OK
Participles: 0.040404040404 0.0370669169778 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62293886347 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.030303030303 0.0208969081088 145% => OK
Particles: 0.003367003367 0.00154638098197 218% => OK
Determiners: 0.104377104377 0.128158765124 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.003367003367 0.0158828679856 21% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.013468013468 0.0114777025283 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1684.0 1645.83664459 102% => OK
No of words: 271.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21402214022 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369003690037 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29889298893 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19926199262 0.187439937562 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129151291513 0.113142543107 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62293886347 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564575645756 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 57.652999099 53.8517498576 107% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 30.1111111111 21.7502111507 138% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2330114652 49.3711431718 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.111111111 132.220823453 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 21.7502111507 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 0.878197800319 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 60.0004100041 50.5018328374 119% => OK
Elegance: 1.6 1.90840788429 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535742626163 0.549887131256 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.16070819183 0.142949733639 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106536833345 0.0787303798458 135% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.713216683352 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124027337519 0.139662658121 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.257870507517 0.266732575781 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117639849989 0.103435571967 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.338258094728 0.414875509568 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0923635626254 0.0530846634433 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361937829724 0.40443939384 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732672540389 0.0528353158467 139% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.