tpo 48
The reading passage claims that there are several method have been proposed to protect frog's population. However, The lecturer casts serious doubts on this claim by presenting some counter-arguments and examples. She believes that none of these strategy are practical for solving this issue.
On the first place, The lecturer contends that prohibit the use of pesticides are not economical solution because lots of farmers rely on these chemical material in order to preserve their yield from insects, thus if we pass laws that reject use of pesticides, make a harsh situation for farmers by lots of disadvantages. This, however, is contradicted to reading passage mentions that if rules prohibited the farmers from using harmful pesticides near sensitive frog population, it would significantly reduce the harm.
On the other hand, it is noted in the passage that anti-fungal medication that kill the fungus, would protect sensitive frog populations from infection. In contrast she clearly states that this treatment is really difficult in large scale due we have to capture every single frogs also it is really time consuming. this project should happen after every offspring for new generation in addition is too complex and cost a lot.
Finally, the speaker points out that our problems is not about the amount of water which we use,make frog's habitats threatened, actually global warning is the most crucial point that we have to pay attention on it because by enhance in this process lots of species have been extinct, therefore we have to search for some remedies which prevent changing happening by global warning. Nonetheless, the text asserts that if key habitats were better protected from excessive water use, many frog species would recover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun method seems to be countable; consider using: 'several methods'.
Suggestion: several methods
...e reading passage claims that there are several method have been proposed to protect frogs pop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this strategy' or 'these strategies'?
Suggestion: this strategy; these strategies
...and examples. She believes that none of these strategy are practical for solving this issue. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 157, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ive frog populations from infection. In contrast she clearly states that this treatment ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 316, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...frogs also it is really time consuming. this project should happen after every offsp...
^^^^
Line 8, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , make
...t about the amount of water which we use,make frogs habitats threatened, actually glo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2846975089 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70921599711 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604982206406 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.9682052057 49.2860985944 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.5 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06452816374 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403883574746 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159327802497 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115834706884 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226384237281 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069122883584 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.