tpo28
Both the reading and listening parts offer two opposite views about the accuracy of Peary's claim about his trip to the North Pole. While the passage lists three arguments to rear this trip, the lecturer, on the other hand, make them shaky and refutes all clues discussed in the passage.
First of all, the article claims that the National Geographic Society asked a committee to survey the validity of this journey, and this group verified this trip. However, the professor rejects the accuracy of the conducted research, since the committee was Peary's close friends who funded this trip. Furthermore, the research continued for two days and they did not examine the trip's documents completely. Therefore, this committee's idea is biased.
Secondly, the text refers to Avery's same trip, which took in less than 37 days, as an example that Peary's trip which longed 37 days is possible. Conversely, the instructor refutes the logic of this reference too. As she explains, the trip conditions of Avery differ from Peary’s, Avery's dogsleds were not as heavy as Peary's, as he did not have to carry his food. Also, the weather condition in Avery's trip was favorable; while, during the Peary's trip take in the harsh and unfavorable weather condition. Consequently, the short duration of Avery's trip cannot verify Peary also went the same path with the same speed.
Finally, meanwhile, the passage posits that by calculation of solar shadow in the photo taken by Peary during his trip can approve his claim about the trip, the lecturer rejects this clue too. As she said, this photo cannot illustrate the exact position of the sun, because it is taken 100 years ago by the primitive camera, which is not precise and is fuzzy. Besides, based on the overprinting the photo gets fated and the shadow is blurred. As a result, the fuzzy shadow in the photo cannot provide accurate data about the sun position and location.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'committees'' or 'committee's'?
Suggestion: committees'; committee's
...s documents completely. Therefore, this committees idea is biased. Secondly, the text r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96594427245 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43474783283 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566563467492 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 1.25165562914 639% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1285062327 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.933333333 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251123140176 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837546932563 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576502657016 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14629174546 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372229761204 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.