tpo31
Both the reading and the lecturer talk about whether the Sinosauropteryx dinosaur fossil found in volcanic ash including several lines around the skeleton had feathers or not. The reading insists on the fact that it this dinosaur did not have any feathers and provides three main reasons to prove it. However, the lecturer believes that the reading' reasons are not rational and points out three opposing statements.
Firstly, the reading states that these lines are the result of skin decomposition in the volcanic ash after dinosaur’s mortality. On the other hand, the lecturer agrees upon the fact that it is not the result of decomposition and if it is, it should have been in the structure of other fossils buried at the same site. Moreover, the skin of dinosaurs are well-preserved in the volcanic ash and it is less likely for the feathers to be decompose in such circumstance.
Secondly, the author points out that these line represent other part of dinosaur’s body like frills rather than the feathers. Conversely, the lecturer refutes this idea that the frills contain more beta cartoon in which the feathers do not have any of this chemical composition which by the way there has been no signs of this chemical composition found in the fossils site.
Finally, the reading explains that fossil structures contended this line near the backbone and tail. In contrast, the lecturer casts doubt on this fact that many dinosaur had the feathers on their tails in order to attract male dinosaurs which called display function. Furthermore, the colorful shape of this feathers attested their display function.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun dinosaur seems to be countable; consider using: 'many dinosaurs'.
Suggestion: many dinosaurs
... lecturer casts doubt on this fact that many dinosaur had the feathers on their tails in orde...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 304, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ion. Furthermore, the colorful shape of this feathers attested their display functio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in contrast, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11654135338 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75367920538 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507518796992 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4150224009 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.727272727 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06452816374 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364507638245 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142214355919 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642837251133 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218981846866 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190027261137 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.