tpo32
Both the reading and the lecturer talk about possible reasons about the noises detected called "quakers"by submarines' sonar. The reading insists on three main theories about these kinds of sounds. However, the lecturer refutes them all and points out three opposing statements about them, catagorically.
Firstly, the reading states thatthses calls are the noise of Ocra male and female mating for calling attention of eachother during their ritual. On the other hand, the lecturer agrees upon the fact that these bizzar sounds can not be their sounds since most of Ocra population lived near the surafce of the ocean water, while the submarine patrolling existed in deep water of north atlantic and arctic ocean.
Secondly, the authors explains that the strange sound might belong to a group of smart skelotenless squid who searched the submarines because of curiosity. Conversely, the lecturer opposes this idea, mentioning that timeline about the appearance and disappearance of this huge animals and the starnge calls. She cites that the Russian submarines first heard thiises noises in 1960 and by the end of 1980, these sounds disapeared. However, the population of this eneormous squids remained stable and they neither started to show in 1960 nor started to extinct after two decades.
Finally, the reading materials points out that these sounds could have belonged to the military of other countries which are designed to be unknown by sonar. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this fact and states that there was no such equipments that could redirect immediately and move around. Moreover, if the were military technology, they should have been more quiet to not attract any attention. Also, since now, no such silent engines and equipments have been invented.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
...s detected called 'quakers'by submarines sonar. The reading insists on three mai...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... any attention. Also, since now, no such silent engines and equipments have been ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31448763251 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63615608088 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604240282686 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9036809961 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.692307692 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341711916497 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103902081023 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601929496588 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178571846911 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258101208412 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.