TPO41
The reading and the lecture discuss regulation of coal ash. The reading says that do not need to store and handling coal ash, but the lecture refutes this statement and provides some reasons.
First, according to the passage, power company should use a specific regulation material that called liner because coal ash components damage the soil and other materials that are in the soil, but they disagree with this law. They say that it is hard for them to use this material regularly. In contrast, the professor states that this material, which they use in coal ash, is not sufficient and for example the ground water might be damaged by coal ash.
In addition, the companies say that they use coal ash in a recycle and produce other products in order to make concrete and bricks in the buildings. On the other hand, the lecture argues that if they store and handle coal ash, they have more coal ash, for a long time, to use in the recycle process and she provides an example of Mercury material that have already saved and could used for a long time. Thus, the concerns about this decrease later.
Finally, the companies claim that this regulation increases the cost for storing and handling then they have to increase the price of electricity. However, the lecture refutes it and says that this process, storing and handling coal ash, will increase the price only about one percent and not more.
In summary, the lecture disagrees with companies' reasons and it is better for all, especially environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...erial that have already saved and could used for a long time. Thus, the concerns abo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, thus, for example, in addition, in contrast, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33622109272 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488461538462 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4708857809 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.545454545 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514432287729 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220770555242 0.0996497079465 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100431202185 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289982763372 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116401365149 0.0443174109184 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.