TPO_43 the agnostides
The article states that there are several different theories about how agnostides may have lived because the fossil information does not give certain information about how they behaved. The passage ptovides three different theories. However, the professor states that the theories are seriously weak and refutes each of the author's reasons.
The first theory proposes that the agnostides may have been free-swimming predators. In contrast, the professor refutes this theory by stating that being a predator needs a well-vision eyes, but the agnostides had poorly eyes. She explains that in order to track the prey they needed to have other sensor, but the fossils don not show any evidence about these sensors.
The second theory states that the agnostides may dwelled on the seafloor. However, the lecturer contends that seafloor dwellers are not fast animals and they can not go far distances. She says that they localize on live in small areas, but the agnostides which were found in different places indicate that they were pretty fast and able to go large distances.
The Third theory holds the view that the agnostides were parasites. However, the professor casts doubt this theory and explains that population of parasites animals is not very large because they finally kill their host. She says that the population of the agnostides were very large which refutes the rule of this theory.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
The article states that there are several different theories about how agnostides may have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19026548673 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46474475682 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522123893805 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1375887883 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.75 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40597079334 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15936062711 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106505462593 0.0662205650399 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245329020294 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318494669735 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.