The article states that zoos are essential to modern culture as it helps to place value in animal life and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecture explains that zoos don't benefit the animals or society and refutes all of the reasons presented by the author.
First, the reading claims that animals are treated well and animals live longer, eat better and suffer from fewer diseases in zoos. The professor opposes this by explaining that in most of the zoos treatment of animals is not as pretty as the article describes. He presented an example of a zoo where two red pandas died by eating rat poison. The safety manager of that zoo was not present when this happend. This incident clearly shows the lack of care of animals at zoos and supports the professor's proposition.
Second, the article posits that zoos are no longer a form of entertainment, rather a form of education. However, the lecture says that most of the cases, zoos are still considered as a form of entertainment. According to the professor, the animals are selected for the zoos based on their ability to attract visitor, not on the educational value. This practice encourages using animals for our own purposes. While some zoos aim at educating the visitors about the animals, but they also fail because they tend to be artificial and misleading exhibit.
Finally, the passage states that zoos help to protect and preserve endangerd species. The professor thinks that the claim is problematic. He refutes this claim by explaining that the overall success rate of zoos in case of protecting endangered animals is rather low though the article presents one example. Also, in encumbered environment the number of animals of a certain species is low and it results in interbreeding among the family. As a result, there is high numbers of birth defects. So, the professor claims that zoos don't have any distinctive advantage in case of preserving endangered species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...However, the lecture explains that zoos dont benefit the animals or society and refu...
^^^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...efit the animals or society and refutes all of the reasons presented by the author. Fir...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...claims that animals are treated well and animals live longer, eat better and suff...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'zoos'' or 'zoo's'?
Suggestion: zoos'; zoo's
... this by explaining that in most of the zoos treatment of animals is not as pretty a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 529, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...cts. So, the professor claims that zoos dont have any distinctive advantage in case ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'while', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272980501393 0.261695866417 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.161559888579 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0640668523677 0.0723426182421 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.050139275766 0.0435111971325 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0222841225627 0.0277247811725 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.153203342618 0.128828473217 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0473537604457 0.0370669169778 128% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6648213462 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.016713091922 0.0208969081088 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.125348189415 0.128158765124 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00557103064067 0.0114777025283 49% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1954.0 1645.83664459 119% => OK
No of words: 327.0 271.125827815 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9755351682 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382262996942 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.31498470948 0.287516216867 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174311926606 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107033639144 0.113142543107 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6648213462 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550458715596 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 59.0008250919 53.8517498576 110% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.1666666667 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.042275823 49.3711431718 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.555555556 132.220823453 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.878197800319 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 49.6651376147 50.5018328374 98% => OK
Elegance: 2.02380952381 1.90840788429 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.541122950392 0.549887131256 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120035882481 0.142949733639 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0813025739398 0.0787303798458 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.537277090805 0.631733273073 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155002596385 0.139662658121 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226707481988 0.266732575781 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094524954919 0.103435571967 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.455061612351 0.414875509568 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0269899889628 0.0530846634433 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.41179767427 0.40443939384 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00979161683683 0.0528353158467 19% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 3.49668874172 315% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.