Some people opine that governments should take responsibility to preserve the environment; however, others believe that it is people's responsibility, with which I am in complete agreement.
On the one hand, it is claimed by many that governments should play a vital role in protecting the environment. The advocates of this opinion emphasise the importance of legislation which only authorities can use it. When the amount of carbon dioxide emitted from power plants exceed the legal limit only governments could impose tighter rules and punishments for such lawbreakers. Furthermore, if there were more affordable and attractive public transportation systems, people would use them more frequently instead of their private vehicles, resulting in a lesser amount of carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide which are the main contributors to air pollution. Finally, improving farming methods, including crop rotation, and restricting chemicals used in agriculture, such as pesticides, insecticides and fertilizers should be governments' primary concerns.
On the other hand, others think that people should be responsible for protecting the environment. The proponents of this idea highlight the fact that, in many cases, governments cannot oversee and control the actions of all individuals even if there might be introduced laws. What people should do is conserve energy, recycle more and use environmentally friendly products, such as clothes made of recycled fabric, compostable bowls and biodegradable plastic bags. These decisive actions might have profound impacts on the environment since the amount of waste generated might decrease substantially. Moreover, people can easily unsubscribe from websites which send unsolicited physical junk mail or even put a ' no junk mail' sticker on their letterbox. These simple strategies discourage such companies to send regular letters, brochures and posters, leading to a remarkable decrease in the amount of needed paper for such usages. If people follow just those steps, logging companies will be demotivated to cut down forests more as there are no longer any markets for their products.
In conclusion, after hashing out both points of views, it seems to me that although governments may have more access to laws and resources, it is individuals’ responsibilities to change their lifestyle to protect the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...licited physical junk mail or even put a no junk mail sticker on their letterbox....
^^
Line 3, column 1030, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...be demotivated to cut down forests more as there are no longer any markets for the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67134831461 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18489656869 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620786516854 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3157134198 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.214285714 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241733502894 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854792081055 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105210848756 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170089579448 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914819644794 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.