Teachers play a pivotal role in shaping the career and life of a student in many ways. While it is important for teachers to have subject knowledge, it is definitely more important for them to relate well with students.
The main quality in a teacher is to be able to explain the topic in a good way to students and this will be possible if they have a good rapport with students. Without this rapport, whatever is being taught, the subject, will not simply appeal to the students. As a result, they will pay no interest regardless of how exciting the topic is and how deep the knowledge of the teacher in it is. For instance, during my school time, we had a history teacher who is known for his outstanding educational qualifications and knowledge in the subject. However, none of the students in the entire school are fan of his lectures, not because he don’t know the subject or something but simply because he never used to teach as he was teaching for school kids, it just felt like he was reading the material. On the other hand, we had a mathematics teacher who was not that well qualified but was definitely considered a good teacher because people used to love the way he taught, he used to make us feel fascinating about the subject and its underlying concepts. It will not be exaggerating if I say we used to believe that those complex differential equations and trigonometry will be used in daily life. This was the impact this teacher had on us.
Further, during this internet era of schooling and learning, finding sourced of knowledge has become easier. As a result, anyone who has access to internet can get to know about things and learn new things. Nevertheless, we are not seeing any decline in school admissions and demand for good teachers. The reason for this is, it is widely accepted truth that we learn better if we are taught by an effective teacher, effective in the sense, effective in making us grasp the subject. Teachers should not just remain as mere ‘sources’ of knowledge. This would be possible only if teachers try to relate more with the students rather than gaining more knowledge. Additionally, these days, schools are places where young adults spend most of their time and we all know adolescence is the single most confusing and vulnerable part of human life. It would be a possible for such students to share their fears, concerns with a teacher who they feel are more relatable and empathetic and get their suggestions. Consequently, this will benefit them in taking right decisions regarding their career and avoid them from falling prey to bad habits.
Having said this, the importance of knowledge for a teacher should not be underestimated since it is a deal breaker if teachers are short of subject. There should be a delicate balance between knowledge and ability to relate to students for an effective teacher.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was the impact this teacher had on us. Further, during this internet era of sch...
^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... is widely accepted truth that we learn better if we are taught by an effective teache...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, while, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2388.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78557114228 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74853187943 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478957915832 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3972567803 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7619047619 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297153884822 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970899461833 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772253715992 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215245584106 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313661661437 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.