some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities (for example, helping at home or at work. Others believe that, outside of school, children should be free to enjoy their lives. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
There is a divergence of opinion regarding the allocation of responsibilities to children. While some advocate for assigning extra tasks to children, including helping at home or engaging in work, others argue that children should have the freedom to enjoy their lives outside of school. This essay will delve into both perspectives, supplemented with examples, and provide my personal stance on the matter.
Supporters of assigning responsibilities to children contend that such engagement fosters essential values and skills. By actively participating in household chores or taking on age-appropriate jobs, children can cultivate responsibility, discipline, and independence. For instance, involving children in tasks like setting the table, cleaning their rooms, or assisting with grocery shopping teaches them the importance of contributing to the family unit. Moreover, it equips them with practical skills that will serve them well in the future, such as time management, problem-solving, and cooperation. These responsibilities also lay the groundwork for a strong work ethic and a sense of accountability, essential traits for success in adulthood.
Conversely, proponents of granting children the freedom to enjoy their lives argue that childhood should primarily focus on exploration, play, and personal development. They emphasize that children require ample leisure time to engage in activities that promote their physical, mental, and emotional well-being. For example, unstructured playtime allows children to develop creativity, imagination, and social skills through interaction with peers. By encouraging children to pursue their interests and hobbies, they can discover their passions and cultivate a sense of fulfillment. It is crucial to avoid overburdening children with responsibilities that may impede their overall development, hinder academic performance, or induce undue stress.
In my view, a balanced approach is necessary. While children should be given opportunities to learn and contribute, their well-being and enjoyment of life should not be compromised. Assigning age-appropriate responsibilities, such as assisting with gardening or organizing their belongings, can be beneficial. However, it is essential to ensure that these tasks do not overshadow the child's need for play, personal growth, and a healthy childhood. Parents and caregivers should maintain a supportive environment where children have ample time for rest, recreation, and pursuing their interests.
In conclusion, the allocation of responsibilities to children is a topic that elicits differing opinions. While some emphasize the importance of instilling responsibilities, others prioritize the freedom for children to enjoy their lives. Striking a balance between these views is crucial to facilitate children's holistic development and well-being. By providing opportunities for learning and contribution while preserving their leisure and personal growth, we can foster responsible and well-rounded individuals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2604.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12705882353 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47109148894 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550588235294 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 0.809619238477 1235% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5226863079 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.363636364 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3181818182 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349916536481 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102794021504 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093732892225 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218967556283 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933172724736 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.27 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 78.4519038076 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.