Agree or Disagree: In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure everything is correct.
Have you ever considered how your working speed fits your life? Some people would argue that working quickly with a few mistakes is a better strategy, while others may consider the opposite point of view. In my opinion, it is clear that it is better to work slowly and carefully.
To begin, working slowly guarantees a higher quality of work. In other words, by spending more time on a project, a person can make sure that is done perfectly. If the person takes the time to check for errors, then his boss or professor will be impressed at his ability to do assignments well. For example, when I was assigned a history paper, I made sure to start working on it early so that I would have time to proofread it and double check for any mistakes. The result was a high grade. Therefore, it is obvious that working slowly can lead to a better outcome.
In addition, working slowly gives a person more time to consider ideas. What I mean is that by taking one’s time, there is a greater chance to develop creative solutions. So by spending more time on a project, we can consider possibilities that we would not normally think of. For instance, when my friend had a problem in her relationship, I did not just tell her the first solution that came to mind. Instead, I took my time to discuss the situation with her until we finally reached a viable option. Thus, demonstrating that taking one’s time helps develop stronger outcomes.
Finally, working quickly with some mistakes can be embarrassing. It should be obvious that errors are unacceptable in professional work, so doing an assignment too fast will lead to problems in one’s career. One case would be my brother; he rushed through a report to try and meet a sudden deadline, but the quality of the work was so poor that his boss was very unhappy with the submission. Therefore, it is better to work slowly and carefully to avoid shame in one’s job.
In short, working slowly with few mistakes can have better quality work, more creative ideas, and fewer embarrassing outcomes. Thus, there is no doubt that I disagree with working quickly and risking making mistakes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: YOUR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'you're' or 'you are'?
Suggestion: you're; you are
Have you ever considered how your working speed fits your life? Some peop...
^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
... brother; he rushed through a report to try and meet a sudden deadline, but the quality...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i mean, in addition, in short, no doubt, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.752 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62752067335 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.384769539078 780% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7231831737 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8571428571 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95238095238 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273089353246 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962482642684 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765458873107 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177358185087 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749997491209 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.