Animal rights has been a subject of debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting animals?
There is a colossal upsurge in the number of academics believing the fact that animal rights has been a subject of debate since the 1970s. It is a matter of concern for many that it will lead to myriad of problems in one's life. However, I do not entirely withstand the aforementioned view and will offer pertinent reasons to support my view.
At the outset, there are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. One of the most conspicuous reasons is that animal rights can not only contribute to benefit, but also lead to myriad other benefits in the different spheres of life. To cite an example, a recent study has revealed that animal rights has been a subject of debate since the 1970s. With such a vast range of perks that it has to offer, not only one gets benefitted more when it comes to being effective, but also it is advantageous in terms of increased productivity, efficacy and convenience.
Adding much credence to this notion, another preponderant factor to support the above proposition is that it is likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and persistence. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of animal rights.
To put all in a nutshell, in lieu of the above highlighted points, I pen down by saying that there are endless advantages of animal rights which are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...t it will lead to myriad of problems in ones life. However, I do not entirely withst...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7015503876 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72960971286 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550387596899 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6046612088 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.272727273 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293076292369 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11799547753 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168693821327 0.071462118173 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162188175713 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735162232467 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.5310837438 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.