Any new technology development in recent years is a boon or a curse for the society in general.
The importance of new technological development which was debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of technology has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on society in recent years. It can be said that technology has bought some positive changes in society, however, some people concern that technology has negative impact on the society. This essay will elaborate, good changes in society due to technology and negative influence of technology and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why technological development is a boon for the society, but the most conspicuous one stems fro that fact that, technological development has made human life easier and efficient. Example for instance, mobile phones, teleconference, the internet, television- information, entertainment source has shrunken the world. Moreover, washing machines, refrigerators have made chores fun and less time consuming. Technology development, thus plays a vital role in improving societies future.
Nevertheless, some people adopt opposing views and tend to believe that technological advancement has negative influence, as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most predominant one lies in that fact that, humans are becoming more reliable on machines and are mislead by the internet. Example as an illustration, negative impact of mobile phone radiation cause heart related diseases, internet bullying, censored and violence content shown on television can negatively effect young mind. Therefore, it can be said new technology development can have adverse effects on the society.
For what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that new technology development is prominent, but the negative impact of technology should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...ety, but the most conspicuous one stems fro that fact that, technological developme...
^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'misled'.
Suggestion: misled
...oming more reliable on machines and are mislead by the internet. Example as an illustra...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76102941176 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1792076137 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8250565146 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267144141202 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103762897399 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673749016298 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174517669661 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470613989301 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.