Any recent invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society.
One of the most conspicuous trend in today’s contemporary era is inventions in various fields. Inventions are regarded as progress in society, and it is imperative to keep on inventing to progress our society. Although, recent invention have made our life easier, however, there are some inventions that can upset peace in society. This essay will discuss, invention in technology has shrunken the society and invention such as nuclear weapons threaten societies peace.
Firstly, technology is rapidly changing the way we live. Technological invention have helped humans in various ways. For instance, mobile phone, washing machine, computers, ATM, iPads, internet. Such invention have made human more mobile, and efficient. Hence, it can be said invention in technology has made human life easier.
Secondly, nuclear weapons are threats to societies peace. Invention in nuclear technologies has the world in fears jaw.
For example, recent conflict between the US and North Korea. A nuclear war will have fatal effect on society and turn it into a war zone. Therefore, it can be said invention in nuclear technologies can destroy peace and harmony in society.
To conclude, this essay discussed how technical invention has bought positive changes in society and invention in nuclear technologies go against tranquillity of society. In my opinion, technology is a powerful tool and it can be used to educate and spread peace in society, and therefore- I support technology invention.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...instance, mobile phone, washing machine, computers, ATM, iPads, internet. Such in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46982758621 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90341640883 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547413793103 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.787349371 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3125 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5 20.9669160288 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18588124504 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709181187835 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612736530599 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110768040226 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651362008498 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.